In a longstanding dispute over which agency has the authority to regulate engineers, the Austin Court of Appeals recently held that the Texas Society of Professional Engineers (Society) lacked standing to bring suit against the Texas Board of Architectural Examiners (Board) on behalf of its members because it failed to meet the test for associational standing. 
jurisdiction
District Court Lacks Authority to Issue Injunction Against Attorney General
The Dallas Court of Appeals vacated a portion of a district court’s order directing the Office of Attorney General to remit payments to a private company that collects and disburses child-support payments for a fee. Pursuant to Texas Government Code sec. 22.002(c), the court of appeals held that only the Texas Supreme Court has the…
Telephone Calls With Forum Residents Can Be Sufficient Contacts for Specifc Jurisdiction
The Fort Worth Court of Appeals recently held that participating in board meetings via telephone with Texas residents is sufficient to establish specific jurisdiction in Texas. The court of appeals distinguished the Texas Supreme Court’s opinion in Michiana Easy Livin’ Country, Inc. v. Holten as follows:
“Although the supreme court has disapproved opinions holding that
…
Determining Diversity of Jurisdiction for Limited Liabililty Corporations
For the purpose of determining diversity jurisdiction, is a limited liability company a citizen of the state where it is organized or is it a citizen of the states of which its members are citizens?
In an issue of first impression, the Fifth Circuit, in Harvey v. Grey Wolf Drilling Co., held that a limited liability company, for diversity jurisdiction purposes, depends on the citizenship of its members.
In Grey Wolf, the plaintiffs, Louisiana residents, sued Grey Wolf in the Eastern District of Louisiana on diversity jurisdiction grounds. Grey Wolf was a Texas LP with members that included an LLC with members in Texas and Nevada, but was organized in Louisiana. The district court applied 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c), a statute governing citizenship of corporations, to the LLC, and held that (1) an LLC’s citizenship is determined by where it is organized; and (2) that the parties lacked diversity jurisdiction.
The Fifth Circuit reversed the district court’s opinion because:
· Every Circuit Court that had dealt with the issue held that citizenship would be determined by the LLC’s members;
· The district court’s holding was inconsistent with Supreme Court jurisprudence;
· The district court’s opinion conflicted with § 1332(c)(1)’s language;
· Louisiana law clearly distinguished LLCs from Corporations.
*For more insight on the district court’s reasoning, see Debra R. Cohen’s article "Limited Liability Company Citizenship: Reconsidering an Illogical and Inconsistent Choice", 90 Marq. L. Rev. 269 (2006).Continue Reading Determining Diversity of Jurisdiction for Limited Liabililty Corporations
