The Texas Supreme Court recently resolved a split of authority among Texas courts of appeals regarding whether the exemplary damages cap in Section 41.008 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code needs to be pleaded as an affirmative defense or is simply applied as a matter of law. Some courts (2nd, 13th, 14th) had
affirmative defense
Lack of Consideration Revisited
The Twelfth Court of Appeals recently held that lack of consideration is an affirmative defense that must be plead. In this case involving a will contest, the court reversed an order granting a no-evidence motion for summary judgment on the basis that the agreement at issue lacked consideration. The court ruled that consideration for a written instrument is presumed. The Court also held, however, that lack of consideration is an affirmative defense. Thus, the court concluded, it was improper for a movant to utilize a no-evidence motion regarding a claim on which the movant has the burden of proof. The court’s opinion in Burges v. Mosley can be found here.
In my opinion, there is a problem with treating lack of consideration as an affirmative defense.Continue Reading Lack of Consideration Revisited